The Israeli government says a drone has been launched at Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu’s house.
In Gaza, more than 50 people have been killed in several Israeli strikes, including children, in less than 24 hours, according to hospital officials
I saw another article stating it’s a Hezbollah drone.
This doesn’t really matter now as Israeli actions are inexcusable either way, but to be accurate Hamas as an organization didn’t really target civilians during October 7th (unless you’re talking about the hostages, in which case I don’t agree but fair enough). They just seem to be unacceptably lax about their soldiers taking their anger out on civilians, which resulted in, well, all that but if I have my information correctly the targets were military. Now this doesn’t mean Hamas is above targeting civilians in general, because they’re not, but I haven’t seen anything that proves October 7th had “kill a bunch of civilians” as part of the attack plans.
What military target was a peace festival?
I mean that was notably not a target because they literally didn’t know it was happening. Still horrible, but nothing preplanned.
I have the same question. The best I can think of might be that it just happened to be next to or somehow in the way of (along the path to) an actual military target. But then (now responding to the other commenter),
That is a degree of lax that seems to be almost nonsensical. The soldiers couldn’t hold their focus on the actual military targets and took down an entirely unrelated target instead. That’s like bombing in the wrong city or something, but a gazillion times worse.
Plausible and will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that’s right, but would appreciate a citation or reference.
I was, in fact.
Why don’t you agree?
I’m glad you can see why myself and others would see things that way.
Fair point. I’ll give this - hostages can be returned unharmed, or failing that they can at least be returned alive. So it’s a horrible choice but I’ll give brownie points for the “civilians get to stay alive” one.
Gotcha. In that case, I retract my previous statement on the basis of new evidence. (Again, would appreciate a link to said article or a similar one, if you can find it.)