I think the point of the “BIG_GLOBAL_STATIC…” name is that global statics are bad, not that the syntax is ugly.
Yes. And my point was that there is an obvious way of sharing data besides passing static-refs, cloning, and using Arcs, which is moving data bidirectionally. That was conveniently, or ignorantly, glossed over by the coping gopher.
Yes. And my point was that there is an obvious way of sharing data besides passing static-refs, cloning, and using
Arc
s, which is moving data bidirectionally. That was conveniently, or ignorantly, glossed over by the coping gopher.