fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAlmost nine gigabytes in size: Windows update 24H2 creates an undeletable cache filewww.digitec.chexternal-linkmessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down18
arrow-up1392arrow-down1external-linkAlmost nine gigabytes in size: Windows update 24H2 creates an undeletable cache filewww.digitec.chfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoWin95 did not suck. 3.1 was trash compared to 95. 95 has a real desktop UI, tcpip built in and a 32 bit preemptive kernel. 98 was great. It wasn’t any more buggy than 95. You ignored NT 4.
minus-squareAsidonhopo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-237 minutes agoPeople used 3.1 and 3.1.1 for years even though it was running on top of MSDOS but show me someone who used 3.0? Or 1.x, 2.x? Unheard of. Version 3 started off with some problems that needed a more or less immediate large update.
Win95 did not suck. 3.1 was trash compared to 95. 95 has a real desktop UI, tcpip built in and a 32 bit preemptive kernel.
98 was great. It wasn’t any more buggy than 95.
You ignored NT 4.
People used 3.1 and 3.1.1 for years even though it was running on top of MSDOS but show me someone who used 3.0? Or 1.x, 2.x? Unheard of. Version 3 started off with some problems that needed a more or less immediate large update.