• Katana314@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Reminds me of many “The reason why Call of Duty sucks” arguments I heard as a kid.

    Like, my own tastes agree with you. But you don’t bring that argument into game industry discussion because fact is, the game is doing very well financially and obviously many players disagree with you. So you have to take that data, and work back to decide what the logical conclusion is.

    • hypna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      If the argument is that SM2 is successful because it limited it’s scope to execute a smaller number of features well, I don’t think that holds up. It took on three different types of games and (imho) executed merely okay. What more could they have added? Open world? MMO?

      I think the more plausible explanation for the sales is that it’s Warhammer, it’s pretty, and SM1 was good.