Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square539fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down1171cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1918arrow-down1image[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?lemmy.worldFried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square539fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32arrow-down13·1 year agoThis isn’t how this would work. You’d get 100 houses, or 100 high rises.
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoWhy not 50-50. Then 90% of both high rises and houses can go derelict because there are not enough people capable of paying for them.
minus-squareNaveen000can@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago100 high rises 100 families!? How
minus-squarePatches@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo we would just stop building at 100 population. Everyone else can then fight for the increasingly rare living space. Just like real life.
![[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f6ec67a5-2636-4875-8dd4-fa5241a3083c.jpeg){kind=link}
This isn’t how this would work. You’d get 100 houses, or 100 high rises.
Why not 50-50. Then 90% of both high rises and houses can go derelict because there are not enough people capable of paying for them.
100 high rises 100 families!? How
No we would just stop building at 100 population. Everyone else can then fight for the increasingly rare living space. Just like real life.