sigh

  • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If Mozilla really starts to go downhill, what are the chances we get a Linux kernel-style community fork that we can rely on instead? Curious why that hasn’t happened before – perhaps because Mozilla has always toed the line of not-quite-awful enough?

    I just hope we can keep an alternative browser engine alive. Would be nice if some rich person would just set up a funding model that can pay a few devs to keep it going indefinitely without ads or spyware.

    • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s one thing to tweak a browser that comes in kit form from Mozilla’s code. It’s another thing altogether to continue maintaining it if Firefox ever dies. I don’t know if any of these clones have the kind of teams needed to do all the work Mozilla have done for them.

    • romp_2_door@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Don’t you like the Ladybird Browser and the browser based in Servo projects as alternatives?

      They’re literally happening right now, not ready for prime time but with continued development and support they’ll become usuable

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because developing and maintaining an entire browser is a huge task. That’s why we don’t see much competition in browsers (I mean independent browsers). Also Mozilla isn’t doing that bad, the browser is still really good. It’s not the technical side that is a problem, its mostly marketing and the image of Mozilla.