• HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes.

        Not a single government (not even Taiwan’s government) has ever said that Taiwan is not part of China.

        I understand why you’d think otherwise if you get your understanding of the situation from online discourse. But here’s the thing: Most online discussion is coming from people who don’t know what they’re talking about.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          And not a single government, not even Peru’s government, has ever said that Peru is not part of Swaziland.

          Strangely, that’s not the same thing as all nations agreeing that Peru is part of Swaziland.

          • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            From 1945 to 1971, China was represented at the United Nations by the government in Taipei, with almost universal recognition. It would be very odd for any country to say that Taipei (and hence Taiwan) was not part of China at that time.

            And if Taiwan was part of China from 1945 to 1971, surely it must be part of China now, because there have been no significant political changes in China since then.

            Both the government in Beijing and the government in Taipei recognize Taiwan as being part of China. Each government claims to be the rightful government of all of China, including Taiwan. (However, the government in Taipei only has effective control over Taiwan and a few islands, while the government in Beijing has control of the mainland.)

            Since 1979, the USA has had a policy of “strategic ambiguity” where they do not say that Taiwan is part of China, but they clearly recognized Taiwan as part of China up until then, and they have not made any statements changing that position.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              if it’s ambiguous, how can they recognize it as part of China at the same time? That’s the opposite of ambiguous.

              • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yeah, it’s not actually very ambiguous. It’s more confusing than ambiguous.

                If you ask if the government in Taipei is the legitimate government of China, the USA will say no.

                If you ask if Taiwan is an independent country, the USA will say no.

                But if you ask if Taiwan is part of China, the USA will avoid answering, even though that’s the only option left.

    • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t the separatists be mainland china? Honest question. Like there’s continuity from the former china government to Taiwan’s, the people’s republic is the newest entity.

        • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not talking about who’s ‘rightful ruler’ or not. The roc was a country and the communist revolution took a part of the territory and made it into the prc (a new country) while the roc still exist in the remaining territory. That’s the definition of a secession. I was just pointing out one of the holes in your analogy.

          Now that you took the time to write that I have a couple of questions. Was the white terror an ethnic cleansing? I might be under informed on the matter but I don’t know anything about any ethnic groups targeted in particular. Your last paragraphs imply that the sovereignty and territorial questions about Taiwan and the People’s Republic aren’t a settled matter for the whole world (except maybe the prc). Are there many voices claiming for the Taiwan government to be the ruler of mainland China anymore? Or any territorial ambitions other than staying an independent island nation?

          • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Chiang Kai-shek’s claim to a legitimate ROC government are tenuous at best. He basically used his position to launch a right wing coup against the unity government and attempted to purge it of all left wing elements. Claiming legitimacy when you’ve basically used force to try and take full control over a government is par for the course for fascism. That’s why I don’t believe the CPC demonizes the ROC prior to Chiang Kai-shek. They still holds Sun Yat-sen, a key founder of the ROC, in high regard.

            Also, IIRC most of the dissidents in Taiwan were mostly people who lived there or who were indigenous to the Island prior to the KMTs arrival. As such, the white terror did involve suppression of a Taiwanese ethnic identity.