It was frightening, and all too familiar. The family had previously been forced to flee as a wildfire bore down on another mountain town they called home: Paradise.

Now, with their path blocked and a horizon swallowed by flames, Kristy had an eerie feeling they were going to lose all they’d fought to build.

“I kind of knew then, like, we’re never coming home again — again, again,” she said.

The Camp fire, the deadliest in California history, devastated Paradise in 2018, consuming thousands of homes, including the Daneaus’.

They relocated to the town of Cohasset, putting them in the direct path of another wildfire, one that has since become the state’s fifth largest on record. Within just six years, the family again found themselves in jeopardy.

The trio eventually made it to safety, trekking seven hours down an unpaved loggers’ road to Chico. But their home in Cohasset was no match for an inferno’s fury.

“We’re starting completely over, again,” said Michael Daneau, 41. Every property they’ve ever owned has “burned to the ground with no value and nothing to our name.”

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It won’t be after repeat total losses, they’ll call it a dangerous area and exempt wildfire from coverage then offer a wildfire addendum for an exorbitant amount. At which point people will eventually sell and investors will move in to make everything low cost shitty multi family homes. It’ll be fun when they announce yet again that is PG&e not maintaining power lines.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m not a fan of urbanization so I can’t agree there, if we talk about medium density dispersed hub and spoke communities I’m with ya.

          I like outside and while green walks and carless streets make it more bearable I’d still rather live on the edge with property to work.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nah, the more urban the better. For the planet, I mean. Personally I like either middle of the woods or middle of the city, no in between. But urban consolidation is best for the health of the planet.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Density is key urbanism isn’t necessarily if public transit is fast and efficient and the industrial center high density.