• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 month ago

    The timing of these amendment proposals is good. Watching the GOP stumble around on Presidential immunity if Kamala wins will be thoroughly entertaining.

    • Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Would be cool if they’d just, you know, work on common goals as a nation. Like, I dunno, climate change

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 month ago

        For that, Republicans would need to be a political party. The thing we really need to understand as a nation is that right now, they’re not. They’re a cult of personality.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think they’re more interested in ways to retain power despite losing almost every popular vote of this century and a base of predominantly religious voters in steady decline.

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You think addressing climate change is a common goal between Republicans and Democrats?

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Surprisingly, in terms of the voter base, yes! About 70% of citizens polled say they think climate change is an issue that we should take steps to combat.

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Republicans don’t even believe in climate change. Why would Republicans endorse any policy that would help mitigate the issue when they don’t think it’s being influenced by man? You can’t negotiate with bio-terrorists.

  • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cool. Excellent, even. This is big news.

    But I don’t need an announcement that you’re going to be making an announcement. Just announce your progress. “I’m going to say something on Monday!” isn’t news worthy, just tell me on Monday what he said.

    This drives me absolutely nuts in news of all sorts.

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That announcement of the announcement is probably not for you and me, but for the press so they can prepare and send the journalists who are familiar with the topic.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s how they soften the ground and gauge reaction. He needs to tell a bunch of people in Congress and the Judiciary what he wants to do, so it’s going to leak that he’s going to say something. Better to leak what you want people to know, and then if details spill through some cracks here and there, it’s less of a story.