• rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    the fact that the people get any say at all in the terms of that set of trade agreements is considerably better than the say we’d get in any other trade agreement

    I’ve no idea what you’re talking about.

    Meanwhile the EU, for all its faults, has rules based around human rights, environmental protection, animal welfare and mutual prosperity. That’s the type of trade agreement that we want.

    EU directives around human rights, environmental protection or animal welfare are not trade agreements. Membership in the EU is not a trade agreement. Indeed, the fact that it is more than just a trade agreement, is the problem.

    Not only that: being out of the EU has cost us 5% growth per annum. Our exposure to global catastrophes has been worse, and our recoveries slower, than EU countries and comparable economies. Our labour market is a mess,

    The cost of leaving the EU is money well spent.

    our governments, without the leavening influence of the “undemocratic” EU, have been more corrupt, more cruel and less respectful of human rights

    This just seems absurd to me. I see no such increases.

    Regardless, you want less corruption, less cruelty, more respect for human rights, and you’re happy to give up degrees of democracy in order to have that. We differ.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Please try to understand; it’s very important. Every trade agreement we make costs us sovereignty. You want a publicly owned NHS? Too bad. It’s on the negotiating table when we deal with the Americans. In secret.

      EU directives around human rights, environmental protection or animal welfare are not trade agreements.

      They are effectively terms of a trade agreement. Goods traded in the EU have to meet standards.

      The cost of leaving the EU is money well spent.

      To what end? Nothing is better. Many things are worse. Is there any payoff at all?

      This just seems absurd to me. I see no such increases.

      Exhibit A: The Rwanda scheme.

      you want less corruption, less cruelty, more respect for human rights, and you’re happy to give up degrees of democracy in order to have that.

      I simply don’t believe we will have “more democracy” outside the EU. We elected our MEPs. We do not elect our trade negotiators, nor those with whom they negotiate. In terms of democracy, we’re swapping a pittance for nothing. So I’ll take the reduced cruelty and corruption, the human rights, and the pittance of democracy please.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        They are effectively terms of a trade agreement

        LOL

        Is there any payoff at all?

        No monetary payoff, no. I see now that money is what’s detaining you.

        Exhibit A: The Rwanda scheme.

        The Rwanda scheme isn’t an increase in the reprehensible behaviour of government, it’s the same amount of reprehensible behaviour as has always been displayed, before and after Brexit.

        We do not elect our trade negotiators

        LOL

        • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You realise that LOL isn’t a convincing reply?

          Anyway, to address the points you bothered to make:

          No monetary payoff, no. I see now that money is what’s detaining you.

          Any payoff at all? I’ll take anything.

          The Rwanda scheme isn’t an increase in the reprehensible behaviour of government, it’s the same amount of reprehensible behaviour as has always been displayed, before and after Brexit.

          I see it as a new low, though YMMV. My opinion is that in general, the last few years of government have been the most destructive in living memory.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So much focus on democracy. Yet when a significant portion of your population (Scotland) wants to vote to leave the UK (partly so they can stay in the EU) you don’t even let them.

      Sounds like cherry picking democracy is no longer an issue.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        you don’t even let them

        I haven’t mentioned Scotland.

            • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Because you claim that the main reason that the UK left the EU was because: democracy above everything. Yet the UK in itself is weirdly undemocratic.

              • rah@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Because you claim that the main reason that the UK left the EU was because: democracy above everything.

                I haven’t claimed that.