The contents of the article must be consumed in order to discuss them intelligently, to create an informed opinion, and to pose questions that have positive worth within the conversation that ensues from its having been read and ruminated upon?
I understand downvoting me under the assumption I only read the title, but I did actually read the aforementioned sentence, but since it was contradictory to both the title and the tagline I was unsure
The contents of the article must be consumed in order to discuss them intelligently, to create an informed opinion, and to pose questions that have positive worth within the conversation that ensues from its having been read and ruminated upon?
Preposterous notion.
I understand downvoting me under the assumption I only read the title, but I did actually read the aforementioned sentence, but since it was contradictory to both the title and the tagline I was unsure