Russia amps up nuclear threat.

  • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you think a nuke being dropped won’t warrant an immediate military response, you’re a moron.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think there’s any need for the name calling. I was engaging with you in good faith despite the differing viewpoints.

      Yes, I believe a small yield tactical nuke in the kiloton range, possibly in the arse end of nowhere, would not elicit an immediate military response because they haven’t said up front the response it would elicit. The West has shown itself to be absolutely afraid of escalation which other potential adversaries are taking careful note of.

      Putin is desperate to hold on to power and this war that has cost untold number of Russian lives is the first thing that has shown any sign of potentially costing him that power. So sure, I think a 30KT tactical nuke in the arse end of nowhere to change the conversation could happen.

      If NATO had been clear about the response if he does I believe he’d be less likely to do it, but they haven’t and it stinks of not wanting to upset him along with every other weak arsed decision they’ve made out of a misplaced fear to not antagonise him.

      Since you’ve been asking me what the response would be, what do you think the response would be by the West to a small yield tactical nuke in the arse end of nowhere?