• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    54 months ago

    I am not necessarily for a ban, but pointing out that it’s not a decision that doesn’t affect others.

    I personally believe in harm reduction. Alcohol? drugs? Smoking? Sex work?

    Focus on reducing harm and the negative impacts become much less.

    • Ashy
      link
      fedilink
      -74 months ago

      The effect on others is no more relevant than those of a myriard of other recreational activity and certainly doesn’t justify a flat ban.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        It may not justify a flat ban, and such heavy handed measures often fail, as this one has.

        Perhaps instead we could focus on harm reduction? The amount of tar and nicotine in commercially available cigarettes today is astronomical compared to historically available tobacco.

        “In the 1970s, Brown & Williamson cross-bred a strain of tobacco to produce Y1, a strain containing an unusually high nicotine content, nearly doubling from 3.2 to 3.5%, to 6.5%.”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco#Contemporary

        The average cigarette today has around 10.2mg of nicotine.

        We do not ban people from driving cars, but we have laws that require seat belts.

        We do not ban drinking alcohol but we have responsible service laws, age limits, and don’t allow driving while intoxicated.

        We do not ban extreme sports, but we have mandates for helmets and protective gear.

        Not having these measures in place affects everyone.

        • Ashy
          link
          fedilink
          -34 months ago

          By all means, smoking is disgusting and should be reduces. But that’s really not my point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            Your point was originally that it doesn’t affect others, and we were discussing the ways that it does, and how those negative effects might be reduced.

            I’m actually really glad to see these sorts of exchanges here more and more.

            I love lemmy. <3

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        So first it doesn’t affect others, now it does but it doesn’t matter? The effect on others is cancer, friend. Not to mention it stinks. Smoking is “fun”, according to you? Yeah, calling bullshit. At best, you’re a troll. At worst…

        • FfaerieOxide
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Smoking is “fun”, according to you? Yeah, calling bullshit.

          Look who’s never smoked and fancies themself an opinion.

          Smoking feels incredible.

        • Ashy
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Those effects are about as much as any other activity you do in private. Neglibably.

          It affect others when you take a walk the woods? Not really. Unless you fall and break a leg and “others” have to come get you in an amblance. Literally every can have some effects on others. But it’s ridiclous to pretend that would be a valid argument for a ban.

          Smoking is “fun”, according to you? Yeah, calling bullshit.

          A lot of people sure seem to enjoy it. Maybe more pleasure then fun

          The effect on others is cancer, friend

          If someone smokes in private it causes less cancer than your comments. Banning smoking in public palces isn’t the issue, the total ban is.

          Not to mention it stinks

          So should we ban your mum, too?