

It’s easier to wage an imaginary culture war than it is to try to make any real changes
It’s easier to wage an imaginary culture war than it is to try to make any real changes
All this “””global warming””” bs is climate extremism! /s
It’s so bad that the temperature where I live (Edmonton, Alberta) barely gets below freezing during winter when it should be around -15 to -20C in December and January. Last winter, we barely had snows save a few snowstorms. Every summer, the city fills with smoke from yearly wildfires and it gets hard to breathe.
The climate was never like this in the last 10 years, yet people still say climate change isn’t human caused or doesn’t exist
To award the oligarchs
Mine shows 990. I assume it only counts posts from federated instances so that’s probably why
I got banned for saying China and the DPRK are oppressive regimes and that Ukraine has a right to exist because I violated “rule 1”. The irony lmao
Because if you’re rich and powerful enough laws don’t apply to you
If he sees a mistake, he’s having Nunavut
deleted by creator
Trump must have visited bumfuck nowhere Alberta and extrapolated that to the rest of the country
They can’t respond they escaped the matrix
I guess you are right in that it is a phrase rather than one word. The point that I was trying to say is that oversimplifying what defines intelligence makes the distinction useless. There is a use in defining the difference between a phone computing numbers and our ability to think and I probably should’ve explained it like that
On an unrelated note, I keep seeing you refer to someone called drag. Is this you but in the 3rd person? Are there more than one dragon rider?
You do have a word to define that: the ability to process information. Defining intelligence in such a broad way makes the distinction practically meaningless. You cannot tell me with a straight face that you and I have the same intelligence as the phone in our pockets; there is a clear distinction between how we parse information and how a phone does.
I honestly don’t see what the main argument of all of this was anymore. If you were arguing that AI has intelligence and can think like us, and that we should treat it that way, then I guess we should emancipate every kind of predictive algorithm while we’re at it. Autocorrect has been oppressed for too long!
It’s arguable whether the worm has intelligence of any kind, after all it wouldn’t even need it.Neither the worm or AI has any intelligence to compare because they don’t really think at all
AI isn’t called AI because it can think. AI is just a tech buzzword for predictive algorithms
Ai (as in current LLM’s and the like) does not think. It predicts what word sounds right based on what we humans have written. It cannot make up thoughts or original concepts, synthesize info, etc. Being able to string sentences together based on probability is not necessarily intelligence or consciousness
English fuckton, not metric
Shit happens. Condoms break and birth control fails. Let people make their own decisions instead of imposing your beliefs on them just to feel morally superior
Or, maybe, don’t impose your beliefs on women and let them make their own decisions with their body
You know not everything on the internet is necessarily directed at you