You don’t get it at all. Also, stop using royal we, your Majesty.

Admiral Paris was also good one.

No rich people, no need to draw a line.

If you want to deny rich people existence, you have to define what rich means, so there is pretty clear need to draw a line.

See, you cant even deliver your stupid thiefy argument correctly.

Thanks for making this so simple!

They didn’t make it simple, they just showed you that you are so simple that you can’t comprehend any kind of at least slightly complex topic.

Don’t worry about it, go back to your young communist lego or something.

I am nowhere near rich.

You have the internet and some kind of computer, which means you are more rich than lot of other people on earth. Does that mean all of them can steal from you, because you are rich? Or are you just a piece of shit trying to justify why it is ok for you to steal, hoping for protection from others at the same time?

Are you getting paid to deepthroat the boot or do you just enjoy it?

I am just teasing idiots for fun. But if you knew someone who would pay for this, don’t hesitate to let me know.

Where do you live and how much money do you have? If you have more than me by any chance, I would like to steal some from you, I hope that ok with you.

Are you mansplaining political reality to a presidential candidate? You should make shirts with that guy who told pope to go read the bible.

Is stealing okey just when you steal from others, or are you also okey with others stealing from you?

The advertisers who spent 10m usd on fake “customers” disagree…

Not what I said or implied, but no, that chance is not basically zero.

He knows all the best words. Some people say he is true genius.

branches that don’t have anything to do with guns

Branch that doesn’t involve shooting the attacker.

Keep trying. You will not get there, but at least you tried.

deleted by creator

Added to that, some smart devices try to measure your exact sleep cycle and wake you at the right time. Phones yrying to do that using microphone or accelerometer to measure sounds or vibrations are notoriously bad at it, some watches with more sophisticated sensors might have better results, but I don’t have personal experience with that.

I think you’re pissed at the objective fact that 12/433 is fucking nothing and your “good guy with a gun” argument

There is nothing in what I said that would imply what side of “good guy with a gun” argument I am on and there is nothing in the data that says anything about whether the 42 people had a gun.

My point is this is terrible and confusing representation of the data, as is often the case in any “data is beautiful” community.

But keep kicking around mad that the version that supports your narrative is not the only possible one :D

Jeez, that’s a lot of words you needed to make a clown out of yourself, just because you are pissed by objective fact.

It can be uncomfortable or downright painful for the dog.

If she can’t get up there by herself, it also means she can’t get comfortably down by herself and she can’t count on you being present when she decides she needs to, so I do understand her thinking.

12 of them is stop by good guy with gun and 42 of them is stop by good guy with massive balls.

No. There is nothing to imply that the 42 people didn’t have a gun, just that they didn’t shoot the attacker. That part seems fishy.

Perhaps now is the time.

No, Time for condoning class war and murder is never and nowhere.

Go back to hexbear, you poor, uneducated, lying, bolshevik piece of shit.

But thank you for showing anyone who may have not had an experience with you before what type of people you are.

One can always count on that, you morons just can’t help yourself.

Hitting the record button is quite active though.