• notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember the promise that cable TV was paid so you wouldn’t have commercials…it lasted what, 6 months? The channels without commercials cost extra…le sigh

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep. It was pretty clear streaming services were always going to end up the same way from the start. Even YouTube has, although that was harder to predict when it was mostly 30s cat videos.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The predictable backstop of subscription plus the nearly limitless potential upside of ad sales is just too tempting in the long run for media companies. They get to have their cake and eat it too. Spotify, Amazon, Netflix and have all eventually given in, despite insisting they never would. Shareholder owned media companies will always gravitate to this model. It’s the only way to maximize quarterly revenue growth.

  • Ismay@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pretty wild to want to add channel when:

    • their interface is garbage
    • their content is pretty lacking

    If they play any “pay for that channel”, it’s insta unsub

    • TK420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m already thinking about it. I can’t watch new content outside the service, so if I’m torrenting for long term storage regardless, why am I paying in the first place?

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      The most frustrating thing about their interface is that if you’ve already watched an episode of something, then try to watch it again, it’ll immediately minimize it to start the “next episode” countdown.

      It’s been ongoing.

      And Disney+ is so crowded with garbage now that they’ve integrated Hulu’s content into it.

    • olutukko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      only reason I still have disney+ is because my cousin used to borrow it from me. then I stopped paying for it and he was too lazy to make his own account to he just started paying mine. I’ve had free disney+ for year and a half now

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I always have trouble watching Disney streams. Bad quality, buffering, slow loading. I usually just pirate the show and switch to Plex because apparently I can run a better streaming service than Disney.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like to sail through the 7 seas: No ads, no monthly payments, all content in only one website. Best deal! Aye aye!🏴‍☠️

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve dropped all streaming services, well save for my YouTube Music/Premium subscription I got grandfathered into when Google Play Music was brutally murdered.

      At this point, I’ll just find alternatives.

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 months ago

    its so tiresome to have all these services constantly made worse. these days it feels whenever a new thing comes out, it has about two or three years before it’s run into the ground in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

    and this kind of thing is also happening to movies/tv shows/video game franchises. it feels like no matter how good it starts, you only get (at most) 2 or 3 sequels before the executives get their hands on it and run it into the ground. sure there are exceptions to this, but they are few and far between. and its becoming even more common for shows/video games to simply disappear if the parent company decides to remove them from online stores/streaming platforms.

    all around, it just feels like things are becoming less and less permanent

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re describing capitalism. That’s literally what happens to everything when capitalism is unchecked.

      “Hey, we’re getting pretty good at producing food. Let’s put corn syrup in everything and make cheap food addictive.”

      “Hey, we just noticed that frightened people buy more guns. Let’s make sure criminals can always buy guns so that we are arming everyone!”

      “Land is the one thing they aren’t making more of. Let’s drive prices up while interest rates are low so that people have to spend all of their income on rent or die in the streets!”

      When profits are the only motivation, then products and services will only get so good before the investor class starts looking for ways to take advantage of leverage instead of innovation. Unregulated markets create opportunities for unbalanced relationships between producers and consumers, and it is always built on the lie that you can influence the markets by “voting with your dollars,” as though enshittification is what we want, what we deserve.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    man, piracy, i mean owning physical media, seems like a better and better method of enjoying media.

    It’s a good thing every show ever has been released on physical media. Right? Right?

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      If pirating it and saving to a thumb drive counts as physical media, then yeah, I guess.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      they hyped up X-Men 97 for months and then didn’t bring it to my region. i don’t even know how there would be copyright issues since it’s an original. they just want me to stop paying and start sailing.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          but it’s THEIR SHOW i don’t get what copyright problems they would have… i understand when they have licensed shows from other companies, syndication etc but why not release original shows everywhere? Netflix does it.

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Let me guess: which channels you have access to depend on your subscription level? Fuck these jerks.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      And they make sure that you have to buy the full package to get what you want.

      New movie releases only costs $10 per streaming on the platinum-full-extended-live-ultra-package.

  • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Honestly this is a nice feature for some kinds of shows. Sometimes I don’t want to watch a show from the beginning in order for certain kinds of shows. The only problem is this feature is coming as streaming services are fracturing and becoming less and less usable.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right, give me Seinfeld shows on random. TNG. Fucking early seasons of Family Guy. Community to an extent. So many sitcoms that you can really watch a random episode and be good to go. Sometimes it’s midnight and you’re too drunk to go to bed and don’t want to think about what you’re going to watch.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right, give me Seinfeld shows on random

        There used to be a website that was exactly that.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah one thing streaming has never been able to replicate is a shuffle mode. Pirating, I can just load everything into a VLC playlist and mix it

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      yeah a ten minute script for your local media playershould be able to manage this.

      edit: or ‘shuffle’ I’m a fucking idiot. I’m literally using that for music right now.

    • kwebb990@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      ya it seems like a no brainer for streaming services. not sure why it’s being poked fun at. if you dont like the feature you dont have to use it

  • Manalith@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    If they do it like Paramount I’m all for it. I like just throwing on the Star Trek channel rather than deciding what episode of which series I want to watch. That’s part of why I get so much use out of Plex’s Live TV channels. Only difference is paramount doesn’t have ads on their channels

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have playlists set up in Plex that I use like a TV channel. One’s all [adult swim] cartoons, another is old sci fi, another is just documentaries. Best part is no commercials.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’d say the best part in this scenario is not having to use Paramount’s garbage software.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Live TV is handy for sports, but sort of out of date for the modern habit of binge streaming a series.

      I don’t really want to watch TV starting from the middle of an episode in the middle of a series. I’d much rather just jump to where I was in my Dropout queue and start watching whatever show is next in the list.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

        For example, I really enjoyed the episodes of the office that I have watched. It was many years ago and it was only random episodes I caught while airing on TV.

        Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn’t the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

        Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I’d probably enjoy watching it. Might even watch the next episode too.

        With classic TV you also get the feeling that you’re watching the show with others.

        Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it. I’ve seen them all multiple times so I don’t really care where I start. But it’s nice knowing others are having a HP bingeathon with me on a Saturday afternoon. If I was sitting there with my plex server, I could play any HP. But I’m never going to put it on and if I did it would just be me watching the show.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

          Then don’t.

          Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn’t the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

          https://variety.com/lists/the-office-best-episodes-ranked/

          Here’s a list of some of the most popular episodes of the office. I’d probably just pick one of the early seasons and go from there.

          Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I’d probably enjoy watching it.

          Sure. But you can just watch that one straight out. Why simply hope that’s the one Hulu decides to stream at a given moment?

          Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it.

          There’s definitely an appeal to rediscovering old classic movies. But in my experience, the amount of crap out there far outweighs the amount of gold. And the purpose of running channels isn’t to give you a steady diet of quality show. Its to run what’s cheapest to run at any given moment.

          You only start seeing Harry Potter on the Daytime Movie Channel when its completely fallen off people’s radars and the rights are cheaper to acquire.

          You’re far less likely to see Channel 1 having a Harry Potter bingeathon than you are to see them showing Gremlins or Home Alone, because these series are far cheaper to fill non-prime air time with.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Some people just like to be able to click on one button and have someone or something else decide for you. In my country linear TV is at least for public service still more popular than the great (completely free, open, and mostly DRM free) streaming service.

            I personally don’t like linear television (or something like this) but I can see why some would.

            People that like it won’t suddenly decide otherwise just because you pointed out that streaming is technically better.

      • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Tbh, I have trouble binge watching most shows. I can’t watch more than 2 or 3 of the same show at a time. Idk why I have trouble with it more than others. After, I usually have to switch to a different show, or a different activity, like video games.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve kinda wished services would do something a bit like this for a while:

    One channel for new stuff, based on your recommendations—just gives you a load of random tastes of shows without you actively picking through things

    One for stuff you rewatch. For example, if you’ve watched always sunny or peep show through a couple of times, put random episodes on this channel for when you just want something in the background

    • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Gonna need some machine learning for this. How much AI in your streaming service are you comfortable with?

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        As someone very hesitant about AI I’m comfortable with it. It’s a streaming service, not my email inbox.

        • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          One step further: ai “enhanced” TV shows and movies

          We still good, or you ready to start pitching a fit?

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        AI and ML based recommendation engines in streaming services have been a thing for as long as there have been steaming services

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            This sounds like a bit of a slippery slope fallacy, if you’re implying that a steaming service using a recommendation algorithm obviously concludes with sinister personalised AI brainwashing injected into my watching, I think you maybe should watch less black mirror.

            If you didn’t mean that, we’ve been using AI in film and TV for ages now, the latest batch of Star wars films made extensive use of it. Hell, the huge battles in lord of the rings used a rudimentary AI system for governing all the entities in it.

            • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m just working my way to asking if you’d watch personalized AI TV bruh, not purposely attempting a fallacy. I’d give it a look, maybe once or twice. Just to see 😂

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      For the rewatch, on Plex you can build playlists and shuffle them. I do this for my kids, one wants Bluey and the other wants Peppa pig. I let the random gods decide what comes on next.

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      There was a chrome extension a few years ago called ottoplay that did something like this, would take your Netflix Hulu and YouTube accounts and set up channels like comedy movies and shit like that, would play random episode non stop.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not being funny, I actually do love linear programming. I miss the days when I’d just turn on the TV and there’s be a random episode of the Simpsons or King of the Hill, or something with stupidly many episode like one of the thousand Law & Orders.

      Picking something to watch from the beginning is a chore, and now I feel invested if I don’t end up being in the mood. Stuff that’s just “already playing” is something I dreamed of recreating when I started (not)pirating everything. "It started 5 minute ago but this is a good episode " was how I grew up watching TV (and even movies).

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can do this with Plex, which I find occasionally nice

        but the enshittification…

        I know, I know, I’m just relating to a comment. It’s also a feature on other sites

        Personally I’d like a “live” TV with 1-episode DVR. As in, I can tune in to a random whatever and if I find it actually interesting I can hop back to the start of the episode and enjoy without having to completely miss the before bits.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I occasionally go to pirate sites that do this. You just go and tune in to a channel with a chat of other people who are just watching whatever plays.

        I enjoy watching cartoon network and discovery when I stay at a hotel, reminds me of my youth.

      • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ideal would be a playlist you build and hit randomize. You pay for it. No commercials. I don’t think there’s a service that does this…

      • Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think my favorite part is the fact that everybody (with the exception of telecasts) is seeing the same thing at the same time, so it was more of a social event like sports. It was so great back then.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re really gonna make people start pirating out of spite lol

  • brenstar@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Minus ad breaks, I missed this aspect of content consumption. Choosing to watch a random episode of a random show just doesn’t happen and I missed being able to just “see what’s on”. I spent a fair amount of time setting up random “channels” I can tune into that play random episodes from tv shows on my media server and it’s great.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      A lot of newer shows cannot be watched randomly though because the episodes actually build upon each other.

      If you take older shows like TNG or X files: you could easily jump back in after missing half a season. The episodes were written to be mostly self-contained, because missing an episode or two because of life was very very common. Season finales were often a major exception, and were therefore also majority advertised so people knew to plan around them.

      If you write a show for streaming, however, there is no concept of “missing an episode”. So the writers are freed from that constraint, and subsequently write shows that are only meant to be watched in their entirety, in order.

      • Tamo240@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Interesting to see it as being freed from a constraint rather than a crutch that viewers can be relied upon to watch all episodes. IMO writing satisfying one episode arc that also makes up part of a wider arc is much more difficult, and many shows now really have just a single arc that only gets good in the last third, making it essentially a 6-8 hour movie rather than an episodic show.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah, you can definitely see a trend towards more HBO style shows as streaming took off.

        I remember watching an episode of The Wire, and somebody else watched it with me and didn’t like it because they didn’t know what was going on and the story wasn’t resolved in an hour. I’m like 10 episodes in, and this ain’t Columbo.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lol all this time these media companies have had to change their models to align with market forces, we’ve watched them hem and haw, drag their feet, etc. this step shows they never wanted things to change at all, and they have the power and the money to keep change from happening. finally we see them at their end game, harnessing the Internets power for something so tiny. To them, the only benefit to this technology is cutting out the middleman and b bringing able packages to you without negotiations with a cable service.

    Their minds are so small, but this and worse is their greatest dream. It’s a terrible, venal world that small minds lead us to isn’t it?

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      And with channels and continuous running shows comes more potential for commercials which will always be the end goal…

      “They’re paying us for the service and advertising is paying us! It’s a win-lose! My favorite kind!”