• Tigbitties
    link
    fedilink
    1046 months ago

    From the satanic temple FAQ

    DO YOU WORSHIP SATAN?
    No, nor do we believe in the existence of Satan or the supernatural. The Satanic Temple believes that religion can, and should, be divorced from superstition. As such, we do not promote a belief in a personal Satan. To embrace the name Satan is to embrace rational inquiry removed from supernaturalism and archaic tradition-based superstitions. Satanists should actively work to hone critical thinking and exercise reasonable agnosticism in all things. Our beliefs must be malleable to the best current scientific understandings of the material world — never the reverse.

  • Zeppo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1016 months ago

    On X, formerly Twitter, he wrote: “My deepest hope is that Americans of all political persuasions can unite and agree that: 1. Jesus Christ is Lord 2. Satan is evil.”

    Uh, no dork, we’re not going to do that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      476 months ago

      In a country with religious freedom as a base, not everyone is going to be part of the same religion and not should they be. The first item on his list is just blatantly un-American.

      • wrath_of_grunge
        link
        fedilink
        306 months ago

        the funniest part is that the Founding Fathers, having just created the Constitution, decided to kick things off with a list of 10 Amendments, they called the Bill of Rights. a list of things that should apply to all citizens. the very first thing they put on their list of important shit, was the First Amendment itself, which states:

        Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

        so this shitbag doesn’t even know the First Amendment, written by the Founding Fathers, to the Constitution he swore to uphold on joining the military service.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          or prohibiting the free exercise of

          See that’s where they fucked up

          Keep that shit in church or your home. No one outside of those places gives a shit

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      276 months ago

      Americans of all political persuasions can unite and agree that: 1. Jesus Christ is Lord

      no dork, we’re not going to do that.

      The next step is to claim that, since you don’t believe that JC is Lord, you’re not an American. And if you’re not an American, they’re fine with persecuting you.

      • Zeppo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Yep. Not even speculation. Look how upset they get when someone is sworn into office on something besides a bible, as if being a Christian is a requirement to hold office. No shame or second thoughts.

        There was a court case I read about decades ago in American Atheist, a publication by Madalyn O’Hair, who was a separation of church and state activist. It involved someone (maybe her?) testifying in a court case in Texas, and they didn’t want to swear on a bible. The judge determined that they couldn’t believe any testimony from someone who wouldn’t swear on a bible because they didn’t ‘believe in a future state of reward or punishment’… as in an afterlife in heaven or hell. Just nuts. That’s seriously the only thing keeping Christians moral? The threat of hell or promise of heaven?

    • Андрей Быдло
      link
      fedilink
      166 months ago
      1. Jesus Christ is Lord

      He is not, in any christian denomination lol. What a blasphemy!

      1. Satan is evil.

      Satan is a questionable topic, if they even exists in original scriptures. Before fic lit like Paradise Lost and the Divine Comedy they didn’t get registered as their own entiity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        106 months ago

        I love it when I see these dudes getting schooled in their own religion.

        If God did exist, he’d probably strike these blasphemous bastards off the planet first and foremost 😂

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    On X, formerly Twitter, he wrote: “My deepest hope is that Americans of all political persuasions can unite and agree that: 1. Jesus Christ is Lord 2. Satan is evil.”

    Definition

    Iowa Code ¬ß 708.3 defines hate crimes as criminal offenses committed with the intent of intimidating or coercing someone due to prejudice against a group of people based on their ‚race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, sex, or sexual orientation.‚ Such hate crimes include both physical and verbal acts of aggression, property damage, and threats of harm.

    Types of Charges

    Under Iowa law, the scope of behavior considered to be a hate crime includes, but is not limited to, assaults, aggravated assaults, stalking, criminal mischief, destruction of property, and intimidation. The degree of seriousness of an offense can increase if it has been determined to be a hate:based crime. This can occur if such motivation can be demonstrated; this determination is normally made by prosecutors. If a criminal charge meets the criteria of an Iowa hate crime, the offense can be charged as a separate hate crime.

    Aggravating Factors

    If there is sufficient evidence to support the presence of hate:based motivations in an offense, the charge may be upgraded to a more serious offense. The possible upgrades include assigning a simple misdemeanor or aggravated misdemeanor offense, instead of a simple misdemeanor, or increasing the level of felony charge by one or two levels. For example, if a suspect committed a burglary in a home and it can be clearly established that the offense was motivated by racism, the charge can be enhanced to a Class C Felony. Alongside such upgrades, hate:based crimes can attract additional conditions during sentencing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    456 months ago

    Fourth degree criminal mischief… it’s a slap on the wrist. If someone had beheaded an effigy of Jesus, they’d be throwing the whole entire book at them. Rules for thee but not for me…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Enrique Tarrio attacked a religious display, was charged “misdemeanor destruction of property” and got 155 days prison.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      376 months ago

      Just like everything else, Republicans fucking LOVE the first amendment until it’s turned against them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        166 months ago

        Thats where you’re wrong, this in absolutely no way shape or form turned against them. Someone decided to play victim and PRETEND it was turned against them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        Republicans love the Constitution until they actually find out what’s in it… much the same as many Christians love the Bible until they find out what’s in it.

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    176 months ago

    The punishment for this charge can only amount to, at most, a slap on the wrist. If it were any other religions monument, it would result in, at least, a felony, and possibly a hate crime charge.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    166 months ago

    christ is used like a brand name nowadays right? its not like any of these people are acting in the words written in his name.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    46 months ago

    He was lucky not to be charged with trying to exclude the religious rights of others. Dumb ass.