She literally called me at the time of the appointment to tell me she can’t see me. She was so apologetic, but was like “I absolutely can treat you, but I’m not allowed by your insurance”. Fuck this country.
Update: I went to urgent care. Before leaving home, I called to be sure they would accept my insurance (Aetna). They said yes… After arriving for my appointment, they told me they do not accept my insurance. I will simply leave without paying.
Final Update: I can understand that that differences in physical biology demand different attention. That’s not what I’m complaining about. It’s the way it’s set up. I was told that at my appointment. Why not just refer me to a specialist? The website could’ve even just referred me to urgent care (yes, my insurance requires a primary care physician’s referral for urgent care, according to the urgent care facility). But, no, their goal is to obfuscate and irritate until the patient gives you and pays out-of-pocket.
I was able to receive care at a cost I could not afford. I won’t discuss what I had to do to “find” the money to pay for care and prescriptions. That being said, the condition I was diagnosed with was more serious than a simple infection, and I’m glad that I saw a doctor. I need further treatment and just hope I can get insurance to cover any of it.
If you’re an American reading this, please consider ways to get involved in organizing in support of Medicare For All in your community. Here is one resource I have found. We don’t need to live like this. We deserve better. Stay safe and healthy, friends.
That’s more than mildly infuriating…
Sounds like discrimination based on sex. A clear violation of the Civil Rights act of 1964.
Car insurance companies are literally allowed to discriminate by sex and will openly tell you that they do so, why would health insurance be different?
Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits different treatment of insured persons on the basis of their sex in connection with pension funds. This was a supreme court ruling, so kind of linked but not quite.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/253100
Interestingly, in UK and EU it became illegal to discriminate by sex for car insurance from about 2012, without very careful use of data - which doesn’t happen. It is allowed to be linked on things like jobs though.
newsflash: US never cared about civil rights and despite it being “law” it gets regularly ignored on an institutional scale
Yes, this is the problem.
It might be, but some health related coverage is legitimately divided along sex lines. I don’t know what the answer is, but it might not be so simple.
Stupid either way though.
Different genitals. But all genders have bladders so why the hell wouldn’t the insurance just cover it for everyone
but females dont need to fart and males dont need to urinate!11!
I cannot stress enough how true this is.
a few people have mentioned it’s because of anatomy and how it makes male UTIs more complicated + require more complex care. it’s not a case of insurance not covering it, op just needs to go somewhere else
Exactly 💯
If you think that’s discrimination, don’t look at the marketing industry.
Discrimination based on biological factors is literally what insurance companies do.
I will look into that. Thank you for brining it to my attention ❤️
That’s what I was thinking. Sounds illegal.
Nothings illegal if you control the government!
You are presuming that it is a UTI and and coding it wrong for insurance purposes. Do a visit for something more generalized that is covered like abdominal pain and doctor will know how to code it properly for insurance.
My friend, you need to do two things –
One, get treated. It seems you’ve visited urgent care. They are “real” doctors and, assuming the hospital or clinic the urgent care is associated with is well-staffed and stocked, should be able to get your sorted today. Be sure to get any prescriptions you need filled on-site, if possible, before you leave.
Two, review your healthcare plan. While the Affordable Care Act mandated certain minimum coverages several things happened since that allow people to purchase plans that do not conform to the ACA mandates. On those so-called “catastrophic” plans, insurers can deny or decline to cover all sorts of things. Patients often simply shop by monthly premium cost and don’t check coverages. Make sure your health plan is ACA-compliant, and, if not, look into a way to get covered by a compliant plan.
If it IS ACA-compliant, then treating a UTI, even in a male, is covered. You may be selecting providers that are not in-network, or do not have the proper staffing to treat this fairly rare condition, though. It may be worth a visit to your primary care provider if you can’t get something like CVS or another “Doc in a Box” to treat it.
The entirely of modern America could be summarized with “Mildly Infiruating”, tbh.
It is utterly baffling to me how the US has not figured out nationalized healthcare. Literally every other developped nation in the western hemisphere has at this point.
Its crazy that a politician could come out and say “my number one priority is to ensure that every American has access to healthcare, paid for by the state”, and would instantly be villified by like half the country.
A handful of bastards at the top are making unfathomable amounts of wealth at the cost of the lives and future of the country. A majority of the country is in support of nationalizing health care. I’ve even met conservatives who agree. It’s these sick fucking parasites who won’t allow us to have it.
All the fuckers writing the laws have socialized healthcare. It’s the untouchables who don’t.
Because the healthcare industry makes money. A shitload of money. Why would they “fix” that? The problem is the fact that it is an industry.
Yeah I think the argument is why doesn’t the government fix it. I mean we’re spending 20% of our GDP on health care when you’re every industrial world spends between 8 and 12… business owners are burdened by the issue of having employment attached to health care. So there are reasons, practical ones and financial ones why the government or the business community might want to change it.
But of course the same government is getting oodles of money from these private HMOs, hospitals, pharma… I mean Biden in particular was funded strongly by the partnership for American healthcare future which was a coalition of health care interest that basically existed just stop the Bernie Sanders campaign.
And while there are legitimate business reasons why a business owner might want to be unburdened with health care, the existence of the attachment of health care to employment gives them tremendous leverage over their workers.
But there are some reason. I mean there are capitalists and greedy politicians and business owners in every other OECD nation and they still aren’t as twisted as the US.
The covid national emergency is declared over. Potentially up to 15 million people will lose Medicaid expansion. Florida already kicked off 600,000 people. An 87 year old who had a daily care taker lost access even though they were qualified after the cut. A 7 year old boy will now die because they took access to his leukemia treatment. About half the people still qualify but they are making everyone reapply.
My dad some how affords stupidly expensive healthcare. Premiums are $4,000 a month. ER copay is $1000. ER deductible is $18,400 per family. My mom is now on a medication that costs $1400 a day. With other meds her medication is $15,800 a month for the rest of her life (she is 59). With insurance it goes down to $28 She has had $100,000 in medical bills. She has some super rare condition. Our insurance said one of the out of network doctors was covered. My mom verified multiple times. Now they don’t want to cover that doctor so we are stuck with a $25,000 medical bill. My mom says she will put it on the lowest amount a month for the rest of her life.
In other words if my dad couldn’t afford this insurance she probably would be dead now or in a few months.
Crazy is that we are all Canadian and if we lived there we could go on OHIP plus extra insurance for a few hundred bucks a month. For those who say Canadian’s have wait times, so do we. The difference is you will be seen and will not go medically bankrupt or denied care because you are too poor.
The excuse is that Canadians come to America for better doctors with lower wait times. They do. But when you realize they come to the States they don’t have long term insurance. Meaning they pay out of pocket. So it’s wealthy Canadians that can afford insanely high prices.
All my family in Canada says my father is pissing away money. He is.
God Bless American Healthcare! /s
TLDR Doug Ford can sod off and go to hell.
Cancer and other life saving drugs in Canada can still be very expensive, we don’t have universal drug coverage in Ontario. You can get coverage if your income is below a certain threshold (ie you are very poor) but if you don’t have drug insurance here you are still fucked and can go into debt trying to stay alive or not suffer. It’s better than America but it’s not all sunshine and rainbows up here either.
It’s… complicated. The US is more like the EU. Every state is practically its own country. Every state has its own health department. State wealth varies greatly and each state has their own opinion on what level of trust should be placed on federal government. The one example we have of federal health care (VA for military veterans) is shit.
Maybe things will change based on the current trajectory… corporate buy outs have been rampant and experienced doctors are retiring to cash in before they can’t afford to run their own practice. It takes weeks to get appointments and most corporate doctors just want to stick to the treatment script they are provided. In other words, corporations are doing exactly what most people fear the feds would do.
Even most developing countries have nationalized healthcare alongside private options.
That’s disgusting if you ask me.
Also, you have to be 18+ for getting a contraception appointment. I guess teens in the US are also having sex like teens in other parts of the world and would very much need access to contraceptives, right?
Correct, they sure are. And abortion rights are under attack. Those teens won’t even have a chance.
Yeah, they’ll have to be responsible and only have sex using condoms. Or keep their legs shut.
You can be as responsible as you want, but condoms don’t have a 100% success rate.
Should have just said that you identify as a woman, problem solved. /S
But in all seriousness that’s just terrible. Everyone no matter if your a man or woman should be treated equally.
These days that might legally even go through in some states lol
I think you’re just supposed to die now…
I don’t believe I can afford to, though. 😓
Are you sure this isn’t just a CVS thing? It says the same thing for me and I know my insurance covers UTIs for everyone. Maybe try an urgent care?
This is correct… there is 2 things to remember here
- CVS only has nurse practitioners, nurses, or pharmacists that are doing the screening, and must refer for certain cases
- There are 2 types of UTIs….
- complicated and uncomplicated
- Men ALWAYS have a complicated uti due to the anatomy of where the uti is located
- women can have either, these NPs are only allowed to treat UNCOMPLICATED UTIS and must refer all complicated cases to a physician.
FYI it has nothing to do with insurance
Are the people in the comments bots or real people? It’s too good to be true that so many people have switched to Lemmy!!
Everyone on Lemmy is a bot except you.
We are bots😃
I checked and am definitely a robot.
We are the robots https://youtu.be/VxF0aja7rLU
That’s so fucked up! I’m sorry OP.
Thank you ❤️
I can’t help but wonder what happens to girls 15 and under when they get UTIs. Insurance company says sucks to be a girl?
Probably.
We knowingly vote for this shitty health care system every two years, so why would they ever change?
At the federal and state levels, we knowingly vote against King Heron so he doesn’t eat all the frogs. (That is, we vote against Republicans who are actively working to neuter democracy).
Getting social safety net stuff, justice reform or even election reform will require grassroots pressure bigger than yhe George Floyd / BLM protests.
And without those things, instead were going to get genocide politics and civil war.
I think we convince ourselves we’re voting the way we do for good reasons, but since Reagan, our votes have resulted in conservative outcomes no matter who we elect. Obama even had a supermajority for six months of his presidency, and we still had to hear the usual excuses people make in order to deflect from criticism of Democrats.
I say this as someone who voted Biden fully expecting him to govern as a conservative because I thought we needed a cultural victory against the resurgence of fascism. And, even with the 1/6 domestic terrorist event, we haven’t seen any real movement to stop those elements. If anything, they’ve grown stronger.
I agree with your main point though, meaningful change is impossible now. It would take an existential threat greater than COVID for it to happen, and in a country where 40,000,000 people can’t afford to miss a day of work, it’s just impossible.
Obama even had a supermajority for six months of his presidency, and we still had to hear the usual excuses people make in order to deflect from criticism of Democrats.
Another way of saying this is that with only 72 days of congress that Obama actually had a supermajority, he passed the largest expansion of healthcare coverage for Americans since medicare/medicaid.
I guess that’s a conservative outcome to you though.
he passed the largest expansion of healthcare coverage
Only if you can absorb being price gouged, otherwise you’re left in an ER to die. He had the power to enact universal health care and sided with lobbyists, and deserves full credit for it.
It should also be noted that Obamacare was modeled off of the system Mitt Romney implemented when he was a state governor. It’s literally a conservative system.
I’m going to assume you weren’t politically aware when Obamacare was being passed. It barely made it through as it was. There was absolutely zero chance universal health care could ever have been passed at that time. To claim Obama had the power to enact it is insane.
Also, since Obamacare contained huge expansions for medicaid eligibility, and Obamacare is, as you claim, “literally a conservative system”, wouldn’t medicaid for all be the most conservative system of them all?
Finally, no, no one is left in ERs to die, insured or not. Heck you don’t even need to be a citizen. That hasn’t been true since 1986. That said, you would get a hefty bill if they actually know who you are and I do fully support a system where that is not the case and one can get treatment without worrying about the cost.
Technically, if the only thing he could pass was a conservative system because the conservatives would block anything further left of it, then yeah, that explains how the ACA is a conservative system.
Obama was very much a neoliberal who mostly continued George W. Bush policies. (Bush was a far-right conservative, even if he was overshadowed by Trump). Curiously, Biden is continuing Trump policies, even to the point of letting people in crisis die.
The Democratic party has had stopgaps to keep it neoliberal (that is establishment, corporate-sponsored) since Carter, who was too left wing for its tastes. In both cases of Carter and Occasio-Cortez, party policy was changed to assure that no-one like them could be elected again. (Though the policy change of the DCCC after Occasio-Cortez was allegedly reversed due to public pressure.)
As Oxford noted, the US is not a true democracy, but an oligarchy with small democratic features. And now the GOP wants to make sure it’s a one-party system, so they don’t even have to bother campaigning.
Yeah you’re only option in that situation is probably to show up at an emergency room. There is still a law that says they have to treat you although not necessarily comprehensively. But they will at least give you an appointment with the doctor you’ll have to wait a long time and you will get a bill for it.
Your follow-up care is not necessarily guaranteed but you will get something.
It’s just so twisted and disgusting.
A lesson I learned the hard way is the only way you can tell what your insurance actually covers is to read the fine print. The insurance company service reps can’t be relied upon and the medical office reps just make up an answer if they don’t know. Nor can you be sure the coverage statement from the insurance company is right wen they finally send it. That’s wrong a significant percent of the time too.
I’m living in Turkey. All health care is free.
but if you live in turkey you get hate for being gay
You get that in the US too, so what’s the difference?
true that
Unless you are unemployed. Then you have to pay the unemployed tax (GSS) whether you use the healthcare services or not.
That sounds so fucking stupid
You’re unemployed so pay us money you can’t recoup until we make you homeless
That sounds expensive. So when you don’t have an income source they charge you a tax for it?
It makes sense if you think about it (assuming my thoughts are correct, I’m in the US). If you’re employed, you are contributing through your taxes. Just because you’re unemployed, it doesn’t mean your contributions pause. Now, should they? That’s a good question, but the current implementation makes sense. I imagine it does incentivize people to look for employment.
there is so much money in the world, and food/water, and housing that literally everyone - theoretically - could be fed and healthy without needing to pick on the unemployed first.
It’s not a matter of amount, it’s a matter of allocation. You have water shortages in a lot of places because agriculture uses massive amounts of potable water to irrigate (and can afford to do so- because water is and should be cheap). If agriculture were more efficient, we would have a lot more potable water- but making it more efficient takes money, resources, work, and ongoing maintenance. Similarly, the existence of vacant housing and homeless people doesn’t imply that we have enough housing to go around. A lot of vacant housing is vacant for a reason- it’s not ok to be shoving homeless people into collapsing apartments, unsafe buildings, a sixth-floor walkup when they’re in a wheelchair, etc. Food also is way more than the production cost, it’s also transporting the food to a place where it can be made available, keeping the food fresh and safe, and preparing it. For a lot of countries with an unstable food supply, the problem is much less that they don’t have enough food and more that it’s difficult or unsafe to get food to the tables of people who are hungry.
This might have been implied in your comment but it’s far more nuanced than “we just need to care more about feeding everybody”- there are real tradeoffs and real commitment of real work and resources, and important sacrifices both known and unknown to any system you design.
No. No, it does not. A poor tax makes no sense.
We can discuss where the money comes from, but the idea isn’t pie-in-the-sky wild. I don’t disagree with you.
There is a cause and there is a solution for our disgusting system.
Conservatives (including neo-liberals) serve corporations, not citizens. If we can marginalize conservatives (including neo-liberals), then we can have nice things like the other 31 developed nations on earth.
This cannot improve while conservatives (including neo-liberals) have power in our nation’s government. Period.
![[Final Update] My insurance won't cover UTIs for males. Yes, I'm in the US.](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3f7f2fe9-6596-4427-a750-ca0a16636fcc.png){kind=link}