- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
9 out of 10 dentists disagree.
Why?
More teeth More MONEEYYY…
Lol planned obsolescence even for teeth
soon there’s gonna be Bluetooth (hehe) speaker and microphone in your teeth. Then the next thing you know is your teeth need security and firmware updates.
Can’t wait to have a chinese lady say “the Bluetooth device is ready to pair” in my teeth.
That voice haunt my dreams.
Oh I’m sure dentists will be very happy to poke more holes in even more teeth.
Implants are already far too expensive, so I can only imagine the premium they would charge for real teeth.
Last time this came up it was a treatment for people who had genetic issues growing teeth in the first place.
This isn’t for replacing teeth that were lost in adulthood.
If the trial is successful, the researchers hope the drug will become available for all forms of toothlessness sometime around 2030.
At the top of the article
Toothlessness does not mean a lost tooth. But if I’m wrong, I’d be glad to be wrong.
… just read the article.
It says this is intended to be for anyone who’s lost a tooth.
Commenting only if you’ve read the article is socialism
This is the same tech. Great for people with no teeth, bad for chad.
what will the legal limit be on number and length of teeth. important
