• Laser@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    On the other hand, I don’t really have a fundamental problem with it. I don’t use Chrome and am not going to use this. My approach to websites using it will be the same as programs not running on my operating system: I’ll simply ignore them, same as I already ignore websites today that don’t serve me because of GDPR.

    I also do see a problem in adblocking. It’s just that it’s the lesser of two evils for me and as such, I opt into it. Google, being on the other side of the situation, for good reasons comes to a different assessment.

    All in all I don’t think this is a good development, but OTOH, if someone doesn’t want me to visit their site, that’s ok.

    • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      What about when your banking site or the site your landlord wants you to pay with doesn’t work because of this shit?

      It’s gonna be a pain in the ass to switch browsers every time you run into one of these sites, and it’ll eventually make its way into most services just because they feel like it.

      There are already way too many Android apps that refuse to work on rooted phones just because they feel like not working on rooted phones after they made safety net. It will be pervasive and at some point you’ll have no option but to comply.